Happy Married Life: Rule no. 8

February 7, 2010

I have written in an earlier post about seven rules of a happy married life. Here is rule number 8. This is important enough to merit a post of its own.

Rule Eight: About Joint Shopping Expeditions

Going on a joint shopping expedition to buy a dress for the wife is always a tricky affair. Stay out of it, if possible.

If you are into this by yourself, it is rather simple. You have a budget (Rs 500 or Rs 2500 or Rs 5000), you have the material in mind (cotton, silk, etc), you know the kind of design you want (Pochampalli, Banarasi, Chikan etc.) and you have a general idea of the colour (blue or pink). You reel out the specs to the counter guy (or a girl) and select from the bunch he or she offers. You choose one, ask for it to be packed, get your credit card swiped and off you go clutching the shopping bag. At peace with yourself. In a matter of fifteen minutes you are done.

Things are a bit different when you accompany the wife. You would go to a counter and ask for saris or dress materials to be shown. The sales person would pile-up his selection without even asking for the specifications. The wife would rifle through the bunch and ask for a broader choice. Bunch two is offered. As you are still trying to act as an interested participant in this activity by seriously going through the weaves and colours on offer, you find the wife speeding away to the adjoining counter in her quest for alternate choices. You stare at the piece you have selected, and you look hapless at the salesman who, more often than not, gives you a withering smile and then you make haste to join our wife. Who is busy evaluating a fresh set of choices. You barely catch up with her when she moves to yet another section. If you are aware enough, the choice of counters which seems random is actually in ascending order of the price of the goodies.

Anyway!

The wife makes a choice. Actually it is never one single choice. Always two or three. One in mauve, the other in lilac and the third in lavender. And now comes the dramatic moment. The sales person drapes each of the selection in turn on his body telling you what the pallu design is in contrast to the “main” design. This happens if you are buying a saree. If you are buying a dress, this display is done by the wife herself. As you are wondering which one to recommend, the wife chirps, “I like the lilac one. Mauve is pretty good too. Come to think of it, lavender is ok as well. What do you think?” Her eyes lock with yours as you are left groping for a choice.

This is the defining moment in the shopping expedition. Stay very calm, keep your wits with you. Make just the right remarks. Do not, for God’s sake, say that lilac and mauve look lousy on you, just take the lavender. Never! And for God’s sake again (and for your well-being too), never rush her. By saying that she needs to hurry up and that she can choose whichever colour she likes. Provided she decides quickly and that her choice is within a thousand rupees. Or even two thousand, depending on the level of generosity you feel at that point in time. Be calm, as I said, keep your wits with you. Here is how you should approach the situation.

You ask the salesperson or your wife- whosoever exhibiting the wares- to do the act all over again. You go back and then lean closer weighing the options available. And then you make that all important comment. You turn to your wife, lock your eyes firmly with hers and say,

“You know what, I am personally partial to lavender. Mauve is not bad at all. And actually, lilac goes so well on you. What do you think?” Put the ball firmly back in her court. Notice this deft reversal of colours compared with her sequence of choices.

The likely answer would be, “I wil go with your choice. You have a great taste in these matters.”

Do not succumb to this ploy. Just do not say that none of them suits her (and your pocket) or that just lavender is the option. Be totally diplomatic and say, “If I were you, I would take them all”.

She will hum and she will haw. And she will be thrilled to bits. That is precisely what she had in mind.

Let her take them all, maybe you should add one parrot-green thing on the side making it four. Quietly have your card swiped and walk out with the shopping bag (you should always carry the bag, come what may) looking like the happiest person on earth.

If you are not, at least the wife will be!


The Joys of Letter-Writing

January 25, 2010

Remember the days when you would eagerly anticipate the postman with his bag of goodies? He was a veritable round-the-year Santa Claus. You would await his arrival with baited breath hoping he dropped into your letterbox mails from friends and relatives. You would read the familiar handwriting in the address section of the mail, tear open the mail if it was an inland letter or an envelope with a knife, a screw-driver or even your forefinger if no tool was available, savor the familiarity of the correspondent’s hand-writing, revel in the familiarity of whatever ink-colour used; royal blue, black, green, or sometimes even red!

The internet has been a killjoy. The instantly-delivered emails and even more instant IMs have taken away the joy. Your correspondent clicks the “send” button, the mail drops into your mailbox. You click open the mail in an instant and you send your perfunctory reply, sometime even without even explicitly addressing the mail to the person concerned. I find this whole process so very impersonal. Like this chap sends a pdf file of his wedding invitation, with the main recipient being his own ID and the others in the bcc mode. You click “reply” and send the following message:” Congratulations, I wish I could be there! I can’t. But will try the next time round”! Sounds familiar?

Correspondence is a personal transaction between two individuals, between two personalities. It is not the facts and ideas alone which are being shared, we also share a part of ourselves. And that exchange can never happen in the impersonal confines of an email. You really need to hold in your hands the stationery in which he/ she has written, notice the medium chosen (whether postcards, inlands or envelopes), see the colour of ink chosen, and generally sense all that which defines the persona of your correspondent. And that is something which the generic “Ariel”, “font size 12” in yahoo mail, or hotmail, or gmail, would never match. Even if it was on computer-generated stationery.

xxx

The lifeline of communication those days used to be the postman. Bhagatji, our very own postman would cycle down our street, tinkling his quaint cycle bell, indicating that he was in the vicinity. A multitude of heads would pop out of the windows and balconies keeping an eager eye on where Bhagatji would park his cycle. There was a tinge of disappointment if “Bhagatji” would not drop in something into your letter box. “Never mind”, you would tell yourself, “Something would come in tomorrow”. You would go back to life, unhurried, but in deep anticipation. Tomorrow shall come, you would reassure yourself.

And “tomorrow”s brought a multitude of prospects. Letters from relatives, from friends, from employers, from girl/boy friends, from sundry other sources.

“Pen-friends” column was a staple of all the kiddies magazine those days. And probably some grown-up people’s magazines as well. There was a regular column in most magazines which had a half-page long listing of those desirous of pen-friends. Complete with name, age, sex, hobbies and address for correspondence. You would choose someone whose profile matched yours and would write a letter and await the response. There were very few girls in the lists, so I suppose they would get a deluge of responses. I did have a few pen-friends the exchange of letters thick and fast initially would peter out over a period of time.

Unbelievable now, but I took this pen-friend business to a different plane. I actually wrote post cards to a couple of dailies in Pakistan giving my background and seeking friends from across the border. (Those days the postal stationery applicable for India also held good for some neighbouring countries.)  “Dawn” from Karachi was one of the papers I wrote to; the other newspaper was based in Lahore whose name I do not remember now. My letter got published in as was evident from two letters I received from Karachi. One was in Urdu, a language I did not know then, so further correspondence was ruled out. But the other was in English and my friendship with Wasim Iqbal continued for a couple of years! Complete with exchanges of photographs.

Letter-writing was taught in language classes. Different formats of letters were taught; son in a hostel writing to father seeking additional funds, letter to the local municipal corporation seeking restoration of street lights, letters to the school principal requesting leave to attend a family function, letter to a friend describing your summer holidays etc. Incidentally everyone’s destination for the fictitious summer vacation would be Simla. My first visit to Simla was decades later only when I was several years into my job, but I had mastered the topography and weather of Simla by rote and would write a detailed letter on it.

The letters to friends and peers were always initiated with the endearing “Pyaare Mitr”, or “Priya Mitr”. And to those senior or for those in authority the standard beginning line was “Seva mein savinay nivedan hai…” That must have been the Hindi adaptation of the colonial phraseology “I beg to state that…”

Letter-writing is still taught, and pretty much along similar lines. That I can see from my sons’ school books. It is another matter that neither of them writes letters, as in a chitthi. Correspondence, for them now is an email which starts variants of the salutation “Hey dude”. And then a string of strange words and abbreviations punctuated with arcane (to me) smileys. I wish they would teach the kids how to write decent emails!

Letter-writing was a must during my hostel days, a-letter-a-week home was mandatory. This was invariably an Inland letter then a very cost-effective 20 or 25 paise. Some friends would dodge this discipline making their parents totally unhappy. In fact, a common point of discussion among parents whose kids were in the hostel was the frequency- or lack of it- of letters from their children. One of my friends would outright lie to his parents that while was indeed punctual with his correspondence, the vagaries of the postal system ensured that his letters never got delivered. His father’s prompt response: send all the letters “UCP”, “Under Certificate of Posting”. I suppose that would have put paid to all his lies.

One you left the hostel, letters were the only source of contact with classmates. Postcards, Inlands and sometimes even envelopes were the means of communication. “Chitthi”,-a letter- was the sole bond with classmates in disparate geographies.

Talking about mail exchange between friends, here is another example. Pitaji, my father, is an inveterate letter-writer. He would write as much as 150 letters a year (I know this as he would keep a log of all the letters he wrote) till a few years ago when his eyesight was still good. He is now 85 years old and has lost sight in one eye and the other eye not too good. But he still manages to write a few letters a month. He has a friend living in another city who is 10 years older to him. Neither can travel to meet the other but the standing pact between the two of them is that they will exchange one postcard between them in a month. And they have rigorously kept this commitment over the last 20 years or so. That one-postcard-a-month routine has kept each of them of the goings-on in the other’s lives, the progress of children, grand-children and great grand-children.

It is this love Pitaji has for correspondence that he wrote to me a series of 18-odd letters on his views on his spiritual guru, Vinoba Bhave’s, philosophy. That was enough material for a book which I got published in 2009. Regular readers of this blog would have read an account of this in a couple of earlier posts of mine: Making of the book, The book release function.

xxxx

I have not yet touched upon a genre of letters which was pretty popular; love-letters. These letters for which the young people of the neighborhood would flock to the local post office early in the morning to pick up the mail direct from the postman’s sorting station. Just to ensure that such letters did not get delivered to others in the family. It was a common thing those days, and perhaps even now, that anyone in the family would open the mail.

Unfortunately I did not have any exposure to this genre till I got married. My wife’s Bhabhi did try to inculcate this into me after I got engaged; She gifted me a bunch of writing stationery which had romance written all over. Right from the extravagant curliqued die-cut of the paper, the pink colour, and the floral motif on the edges. I was expected to write “love-letters” to my would-be wife on this stationery as we waited out the few months before the wedding took place.

I think wrote one letter on this stationery. But the one letter to her which I remember the most was scribbled on something completely different.

I was a regional sales manager based In Delhi covering North India. A twice-a-month visit to Punjab was common. On one of the train-rides from Ambala to Delhi I got no seating place, the train was so crowded. I had to manage with just enough standing space. I was bored as hell, and then I had this sudden urge to write to me fiancée. Those days most of us sales managers carried a small notebook- spiral bound- in our shirt pockets. This was used to note some salient points from our market work: distributor’s outstanding, his stock-holding, details of the cheques collected etc. I pulled out my notebook. And wrote to my fiancee one lengthy letter, consuming the entire notebook, standing in the train from Ambala to New Delhi. I poured out my love to her into those tiny pieces of paper.

And that, dear readers, was my first and the last love-letter.

I wonder if my dear wife  has preserved the letter. Even if she has not, I still dearly preserve the memory….


“The Three Idiots” and I

January 17, 2010

The Making of an “Idiot”:

I have kept away from the reviews of “3 idiots” as I always do when I plan to see a particular movie; it has been a few weeks since the movie was released. While I could keep myself off the printed reviews, I could not prevent my friends’ and colleagues’ impromptu reviews and the masses of unsolicited emails. Not to mention the recaps of the movie from my sons whose friends had seen the movie in the very first weekend while the family kept away from it as son-the-elder was writing his 10th pre-boards and we decided to abstain from movies in that period. (Now, having seen the movie, I think I was championing the very system the film was trying to denounce). May be I should have allowed my elder son to keep practicing on his fledgling guitar knowledge or his general mastery in computer games instead of focusing on academics.

XXXX

I have been a product of a system very similar to that of Imperial College of Engineering, the Institute of technology of Banaras Hindu University (IT-BHU, Varanasi). Not one of the IITs, but it was then one of the only two colleges outside the (then) five IITs which admitted students based on the much awe-inspiring JEE, the great IIT Joint Entrance Exam.

XXXX

Those days, for a reasonably bright student in a middle-class family, there were just two options for further studies, engineering or medicine. Arts and commerce were not in consideration. Commerce, maybe, if you were from a business family or a family of Cost Accountants and Chartered Accountants. Arts was the last resort for all, though your parents would conceal their general disappointment by telling all those who would care to listen that their child was aiming for the IAS- that Holy Grail for the middle-class families. The large majority could at best hope to become a probationary officer in a scheduled bank. Most landed up learning typing/ stenography and hoping to become a clerk somewhere. Courses like Computer Applications (BCA, MCA), Journalism, Hospitality, Aviation et al just did not exist!

Coming now to selection of engineering versus medicine: it was mostly a negative choice; if you did not like- or did not do well in- Maths, you were destined to pursue medical entrance. Likewise, lack of fondness for Biology made you pursue the engineering stream if you were otherwise a bright chap.

However, like Madhavan who wanted to be a wild-life photographer, I had these romantic notions of being a journalist. My father, a college professor, on realizing that I doth protest too much, plotted with my elder brother and sat me down for some “advice”. They convinced me into pursuing preparations for the engineering stream. They remarked that to be a successful in life- even as a journalist- I needed to have intelligence. That was a motherhood statement, I had to agree. If one exam does prove relative intelligence, they continued, it is the JEE. That kind of sealed my “fate”, as it were. If thought I was intelligent I needed to prove to my family and the world at large, that I indeed was brainy. That made sense to me and I decided to take a shy at the much-feared JEE.

Pitaji was a Hindi professor and he had no idea about matters-science. But he knew a trick-or-two about education. He consulted his colleagues in the sciences departments of his college and was advised that whatever I may want to pursue in life, excellence in mathematics was essential. “Santosh”, they advised, “needs to be a year ahead of his class in math.” So, off I was, attending tuition classes in trigonometry while my friends were struggling with algebra. I was learning Calculus while my classmates were learning the rudiments of sin squared+ cos squared= 1. I hated all this. I even bunked a few of these classes to see the latest film releases.

With some hard work and lots of luck, I did pass the JEE. Never mind the rank. I had the consolation of being in the “exalted” list of something like 2000 qualifiers from among 1.5 lakh applicants. I do not know the stats now, the number of applicants has increased manifolds since, and so has the number of IIT seats as there are many more IITs now. The ratio remains somewhat unchanged even now.

XXXX

The Myth of Rancho, the Great:

I have a fundamental problem with the character of Rancho. I do not agree with the premise that a Rancho can be a comfortable topper without investing time and effort in academics. Sure, Rancho has a thing for machines and can tear them apart and fix them back. Sure he can get the aeroplane-like contraption to fly. But topping the class? I have my doubts. The bindaas Ranchos I have seen during my five years of engineering were at their  best middling in academics or often at the bottom of the class. A true engineer is more than someone who can repair machines, there is a lot more to engineering than just fixing nuts and bolts in the right places. You are not training at the local polytechnic to be a mere mechanic.

(I have one more crib with Rancho, he had the IQ of Einstein- or maybe more- and also was a great friend. He should have realized that his two room-mates did not have matching IQs and should have advised them to pack-in some studies instead of indulging in sundry extra-curricular activities all the time.)

The guys in my Institute who really did well academically were a mix of fun and studies. Of the two toppers in my class, one was into movies of all types while the other was a solidly-built football half-back. The rival teams dreaded him! Sure they studied, but not at the expense of fun. The film guy, by the way, is now a global nano-material scientist with tons of papers published in the coveted journal “Nature”. But in no way I can describe him as a uni-dimensional character, a nerd. The topper in the batch senior to ours was an ace drummer and the Institute cricket captain. And he too studied hard.

Of course, there were enough Chatur’s lurking around, but I cannot remember anyone of these ever making it to the top of the class. Rare was a nerd who topped. To that extent I agree with the portrayal of the character.

The fact remains that the Institute was a great place to gain knowledge and meet and make friends with some supremely talented folks. Music, theater, sports, arcane hobbies; the range on display was breath-taking. A few did kind of drift-off and lose all sense of perspective (I have known seniors who spent 7-8 years to get their 5-year engineering degree.) But most students were intelligent folks who managed to mix work and fun. After all, these were some of the brightest students of their times who occasionally indulged their sundry other interests with like-minded folks.

Like I mentioned earlier, I had no great interest in engineering but having qualified for studying at the Institute I made sure my grades were reasonably healthy through those five years. I may not have been in the top quartile, but what-the-hell, I had my share of fun. Directing plays, editing the campus magazine for a couple of years, picking up cryptic crosswords and going on- what some considered crazy- a 800 km cycle trip from Varanasi to Delhi. I never aspired to top the class, not that aspiring would have helped given the general IQ levels floating around. But I had my fun and passed out much richer in terms of skills learnt, friends made, and generally knowing a little bit more about what all a human can do. And by the way, my CGPA was Ok and I had a coveted campus job as well in the bag when I graduated. It is another matter than I was fortunate enough not to take up the job.

But that is another story!


Ornaments of Hindi Film Music

January 15, 2010

One highly most under-rated films of Amitabh Bachchan is “Saudaagar” with Nutan and Padma Khanna as co-stars. This post is not about this film but takes off on the mukhda of one of its songs. “Sajnaa hai mujhey, sajnaa ke liye” an Asha Bhosle solo sung on-screen by Padma K. Notice the play on sajnaa? P.K. is sajo-ing pretty lasciviously for the camera as she bathes in the village pond in preparation for a rendezvous with her sajnaa. Sajo-ing is an integral part of a woman’s life, bathing and beyond. And the greatest accessories for such purpose are ornaments, preferably gold and silver. This post is about ornaments in Hindi film music.

Rare is the woman who does not covet objects of ornamentation. Rare is a visible part of her anatomy she does not desire to be decorated with a trinket or two. The ornamentation need not be made of gold alone, or silver, or diamond, in fact it need not be metallic at all! Even makeshift flower ornaments do the job sometimes. The ornamentation need not convey her pulchritude alone, but carry tons of other symbolism. From sheer beauty, to playfulness to plain sexual innuendos.

The ornaments cover her from toes upwards (“nakh-shikh” is the operative Hindi phrase to convey total coverage). The popular ones are bangles (choodi, kangan), ear-rings (bala, jhumka), anklets (payal, ghungroo), necklace (naulakha)

See full size image

Bala is a piece of gold worn in the earlobes. All females, in their early childhood, have perforations made into their earlobes which are then inserted with an ear-stud to keep the cavity intact till she is able to adorn her ears with a bala, an ear-ring. Often holds a circular affair to start with, then a suspender for odd-shaped objects ranging from a cross to a globe to a butterfly, whatever. But the archetypal adornment is a bala, a large round earring. This often serves as a basis to songs like “Dhoondo dhoondo rey Saajna, morey kaan ka bala”. The loss of the bala is fraught with multiple dangers, the most troublesome being parental queries on how the bala got lost in the first place. The obvious suspicion from the parents being its displacement in a moment of teenagerish indiscretion under “Thandey-thandey harey-harey neem taley”.

See full size image

The bala, or its cousin, the jhumka, finds its way eventually to the lost-and-found department. Sample this: “Mila hai kisika jhumka, thandey-thandey, harey-harey, neem taley”. The question now is whether the jhumka got lost due to mechanical imperfections of the fixing mechanism or the God-ordained hormonal surge. Take your pick.

Jhumkas can get misplaced in many locations, a popular one being the bazaars of Bareilly, “Bareilly ke bazaar mein,  jhumka gira rey”. This otherwise non-descript town of UP made popular by the song. Sometimes the hero would excuse such indiscretions by cooing “Gir gaya jhumka,  girney do.” Rarely does he get frustrated, despite having sung paeons of love to her jhumka: “Kaan mein jhumka, chaal mein thumka”. And if he does get hassled he can only sigh to himself: “Hai rey hai, tera jhumka.”

A small piece of information on the bala. Bala’s diminutive is bali- a small bala. Bali is not to be confused with baali as in “Salaam, teri baali umar ko salaam”. Baali umar waalis are often the losers of their balis, balas, or jhumkas at an age when they are not expected to.

XXXX

See full size image

The counterpart to the jhumka is the paayal, the anklet. The English translation does not sound as meaningful as the original Hindi one. But paayal can be as meaningful as the jhumka. Paayal’s primary purpose of the existence is to spread romance in general and amatory instincts in particular. Largely banking on its audio impact. There could be a walkway resonating with the tinkle of these low-placed ornaments –“Paayal ki jhankar rastey rastey”- to the humble paayal breaking into a song along the way; “Paayaliya geet suniye, sargam gaaye”. Or even the searingly romantic “Chham, chham boley rey payaliya.”

See full size image

A cousin of the paayal is the ghungroo, a much celebrated romantic adornment on the ankles. Often the mandatory accessory of dancers. Right from the celebratory “Pag ghungroo bandh Meera naachi rey” to the defiant “Mohey aayi na jag sey lag, ki intna zor sey naachi aaj, ki ghunghroo toot gaye.” Or even this deeply melancholic Kishore Kumar number: Ghunghroo ki tarah, bajta hi raha hoon mein.” The mention of Kishore K and ghunghroo should not confuse you with another famous song: “Mein hoon jhum, jhum Jhumroo”. No resonance between that beautiful ghunghroo and the country bumpkin, Jhumroo!

XXXX

The most voluble romantic instrument- I must call it that- which produces a fair amount of noise is the choodi. Those ubiquitous bangles. Choodis would strike up a seductive piece at midnight, “Choodiyan khanak gayein aadhi raat ko”. Or strike up a romantic symphony anytime with the accompaniment of the kangana, “Bolein choodiyan, boley kangana.” Even the macho hero, who was hardly the choodi -wearing types would rapturously declare his romantic intent by using the choodi as a metaphor for his romantic inclinations: “Choodi nahin mera dil hai; dekho, tootey na.” “Do not break my heart, O’ my damsel, my cardiac muscles have reached a stage of degeneration enough to be compared to the fragile glass bangles which adorn your slender wrists”. Ok, that was not the most honest translation of the Hindi song, but please excuse me, I am trying to sketch for you the hero’s intensity of romance.

The choodis came in handy for the heroine to protect her virginity. She appealed: “Merey haathon mein nau-nau choodiyan hain, zara thehro sajan majbooriyan hain.” Not that she was averse to an intense romantic interlude, but was watchful about the majbooriyan inflicted by presumably the zalim samaaj-the cruel society.

XXXX

It is not that just the gold, silver, glass etc were the only adornments. There were some common place accessories readily available in the make-up kit of the woman to enable rapid adornment. Like, for example, Kaajal, bindi, or even a zulf- a curl of her hair. But these, perhaps, are elements for another post.

XXXX


Psychology of Liking a Person: Part 1

January 8, 2010

Please take out your pen and a sheet of paper and answer this simple question: “Which five friends do you like?” Quite simple, no?

I can imagine you scribbling quickly; Sapna… Meena… Neha. Or, Sanjay… Sunil… Rajiv. Or even a mix of genders. Sapna… Sunil… Meena. Very simple, right? We all can easily write the names of people we like. Open and shut case, of course I know who I like. Fair enough.

Now let me reverse the question. I hope your pen and paper remain ready.

Please now list five friends who Sapna, Meena and Neha like. You should be able to answer this one, pat. So you should be able to list very quickly 5 likeable friends for each of these friends. Sure, you think for yourself, I know exactly what (and who) she likes.

I shall wait as you do that.

You think I am writing one of my usual, light-hearted, frivolous pieces as usual. I am not. So please do go ahead and put your pen to paper.

Done? Then let us proceed ahead.

Scan the lists of the liked ones of people you like. How many of these five lists do you appear in? I can take a bet, you do not appear in all the five lists. Right? Surprised? And you think I am P.C. Sorcar Jr. to have guessed what you see? Perhaps I am. But we shall wait and watch. Just stay with me and be honest with this exercise, you will not regret it. (Or maybe, you will!) Stay with me and the rules of this game. And I hope the sheet of paper you have chosen is big enough to accommodate all my questions, there are more coming.

List the top five people whose company you enjoy the most, the ones with whom you would most like to spend time with. And now, since you know this game, take a guess on which of your chosen five will have you on their lists. This may be a difficult, but take a shot. You may find you do not feature in the lists of all of them.  You would normally assume they would find your company pleasurable too.

If you feel disturbed suddenly that you feature in less than five of the lists, I will not be surprised. I would have been surprised if you did, indeed, show up in even four of the five. And please remember, you have been the one all along making these lists, I have not even asked any of your friends you like, as to who they like. You could be in for a greater surprise on seeing the lists obtained from your preferred companions.

Here is a tougher one. Write down the names of 5 of your friends whom you admire. And guess the 5 whom you think these admired friends would place in their lists of the friends they admire. I know you do not know this for sure, no one does, but please do go ahead.

Do you feature in any of these lists? Chances are, very few of these lists!

If it is a little disturbing for you, I empathize. I was hassled too, when I undertook this exercise. Those we like may not find my company most enjoyable, those whose companies I enjoy may not revel in mine. And those who I admire do not admire me. These truths haunt you and you start wondering about your own judgments and philosophies in life.

A pretty unpleasant experience, overall. So why did I get you to embark upon this?  And let me assure you, this is not one of those pieces from the new-age, self-help book claptraps. This is an actually an outcome of a study I have done, the findings of this study I did a couple of decades ago left me rather taken aback.

Anyway, all this background details can wait till the next post.

For now, I wish that those who have been “cheating” all along- not making the lists as suggested- please go ahead and do so. Let me assure you, you will not regret it.

Or maybe, you will, depending on whether you see the glass “half-full” or “half-empty”!